On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:59:26 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > I reviewed this patch 3 months ago and did not hear back. Are you going
> > to update this patch and resubmit, or should I just drop it?
>
> Uwe is on holiday. I'll take care about it if the need is still there...
The need was Uwe's o
> I reviewed this patch 3 months ago and did not hear back. Are you going
> to update this patch and resubmit, or should I just drop it?
Uwe is on holiday. I'll take care about it if the need is still there...
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang|
Industr
Uwe,
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:25:36 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:43:32 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The respective values are evaluated at each read/write, so no further
> > action is required than to change the perm argument to module_param.
> >
> > Note there is no sa
Hi Uwe,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:43:32 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The respective values are evaluated at each read/write, so no further
> action is required than to change the perm argument to module_param.
>
> Note there is no sanity check so root can make the driver effectively
> unusable b
The respective values are evaluated at each read/write, so no further
action is required than to change the perm argument to module_param.
Note there is no sanity check so root can make the driver effectively
unusable but that's what root is for :-)
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
drivers/m
5 matches
Mail list logo