Hello.
On 21/12/16 19:30, Chris Healy wrote:
On Dec 21, 2016 5:11 AM, "Stefan Schmidt" mailto:ste...@osg.samsung.com>> wrote:
Hello.
On 19/12/16 00:25, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so
there's
no need to imp
Hello.
On 19/12/16 00:25, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so there's
no need to implicitly put such restriction on it by using gpio_set_value
to manipulate it. Replace gpio_set_value to gpio_set_value_cansleep to
fix that.
We need to make sure w
Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so there's
no need to implicitly put such restriction on it by using gpio_set_value
to manipulate it. Replace gpio_set_value to gpio_set_value_cansleep to
fix that.
As a an example of where such restriction might be inconvenient,
consider
3 matches
Mail list logo
