Hi Martin,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 5:53 AM Martin K. Petersen
wrote:
> I really wish we had some more data to work with :(
>
> Lacking a proper heuristic I guess we don't have any choice to disable
> the feature. But that's sad news for the people who currently don't have
> problems since their
On 15/07/2020 21:53, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> Despite the unsubstantiated claim from Samsung that "the improved
>> queued trim enhances Linux compatibility" this does not appear to be
>> true, even on Intel SATA controllers:
>
> I am aware of several people using 860 drives with queued TRIM.
Hi Simon!
> Despite the unsubstantiated claim from Samsung that "the improved
> queued trim enhances Linux compatibility" this does not appear to be
> true, even on Intel SATA controllers:
I am aware of several people using 860 drives with queued TRIM. And I
haven't heard any complaints
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:13 PM Simon Arlott wrote:
> the original justification for
> enabling appears to be based on marketing material with no explanation
> of what has been changed to make the 860 work properly when the earlier
> 840 and 850 both have the same issue.
Yes, this was
Despite the unsubstantiated claim from Samsung that "the improved
queued trim enhances Linux compatibility" this does not appear to be
true, even on Intel SATA controllers:
Bug 203475 - Samsung 860 EVO queued TRIM issues
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203475
Disable queued TRIM for
5 matches
Mail list logo
