Hi,
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2014, 17:15:32 schrieb Lee Jones:
> Actually there is a better way still:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE)
> struct backlight_device *of_find_backlight_by_node(struct device_node
> *node); #else
> static inline struct backlight_device
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2014, 17:15:32 schrieb Lee Jones:
Actually there is a better way still:
#ifdef CONFIG_OF IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE)
struct backlight_device *of_find_backlight_by_node(struct device_node
*node); #else
static inline struct backlight_device *
> > >
> > > > I've removed this patch, as it causes unexpected:
> > > > Redefinition of of_find_backlight_by_node()
> > >
> > > I reproduced the same build error.
> > >
> > > Then, how about folding the following two pa
; > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Applied to Backlight -next with Jingoo's Ack.
> > >
> > > I've removed this patch, as it causes unexpected:
> > > Redefinition of of_find_backlight_by_node()
&g
gt; > Applied to Backlight -next with Jingoo's Ack.
> >
> > I've removed this patch, as it causes unexpected:
> >
> > Redefinition of of_find_backlight_by_node()
>
> I reproduced the same build error.
>
> Then, how about folding the following two patches into
&g
by_node()
I reproduced the same build error.
Then, how about folding the following two patches into
one single patch? These two patches were already sent by Heiko Stübner.
[PATCH] backlight: use of_find_backlight_by_node stub when backlight class
disabled
[PATCH] backlight: extend
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>
> > Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
> > class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function
> > referenced
> > in the backlight header.
> >
> >
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014, Lee Jones wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function
referenced
in the backlight header.
Therefore use the
] backlight: use of_find_backlight_by_node stub when backlight class
disabled
[PATCH] backlight: extend of_find_backlight_by_node stub-check to modules
Then, the one single patch will do as follows.
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+#if defined(CONFIG_OF) (defined(CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE
patch? These two patches were already sent by Heiko Stübner.
[PATCH] backlight: use of_find_backlight_by_node stub when backlight class
disabled
[PATCH] backlight: extend of_find_backlight_by_node stub-check to modules
Then, the one single patch will do as follows.
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
.
Then, how about folding the following two patches into
one single patch? These two patches were already sent by Heiko Stübner.
[PATCH] backlight: use of_find_backlight_by_node stub when backlight
class disabled [PATCH] backlight: extend of_find_backlight_by_node
stub-check
of of_find_backlight_by_node()
I reproduced the same build error.
Then, how about folding the following two patches into
one single patch? These two patches were already sent by Heiko Stübner.
[PATCH] backlight: use of_find_backlight_by_node stub when backlight
class
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
> class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function referenced
> in the backlight header.
>
> Therefore use the stub function also when the backlight class is
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function referenced
in the backlight header.
Therefore use the stub function also when the backlight class is
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:20 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>
> Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
> class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function referenced
> in the backlight header.
>
> Therefore use the stub function also when
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:20 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function referenced
in the backlight header.
Therefore use the stub function also when the
Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function referenced
in the backlight header.
Therefore use the stub function also when the backlight class is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner
---
Drivers may want to search for an optional backlight even when the backlight
class is disabled. In this case the linker would miss the function referenced
in the backlight header.
Therefore use the stub function also when the backlight class is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner
18 matches
Mail list logo
