On Thursday, July 12, 2018 11:18:26 AM CEST Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> 2018-07-12 10:55 GMT+02:00 Greg KH :
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> >> In some cases the link between between customer and supplier
> >> already exist. Do not warn about already existing
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> In some cases the link between between customer and supplier
> already exist. Do not warn about already existing dependencies
> because device_link_add() take care of this case.
Reviwed-by: Mark Brown
signature.asc
Description
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:18:26AM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> 2018-07-12 10:55 GMT+02:00 Greg KH :
> > Why would a link already exist that is asked to be created again? What
> > code path causes this?
> It could happen that the link exist because a device use it parent as
> supplier.
> T
2018-07-12 10:55 GMT+02:00 Greg KH :
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> In some cases the link between between customer and supplier
>> already exist. Do not warn about already existing dependencies
>> because device_link_add() take care of this case.
>
> Why wo
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:06:23AM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> In some cases the link between between customer and supplier
> already exist. Do not warn about already existing dependencies
> because device_link_add() take care of this case.
Why would a link already exist that is asked to be
In some cases the link between between customer and supplier
already exist. Do not warn about already existing dependencies
because device_link_add() take care of this case.
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard
---
drivers/base/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insert
6 matches
Mail list logo