Re: [PATCH] base: dd: don't remove driver_data in -EPROBE_DEFER case

2016-05-03 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:07:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:11:26PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:15:22PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote: > > > the driver_data may be used for sanity check, it fails the > > > probe() if driver_data is NULL after it is

Re: [PATCH] base: dd: don't remove driver_data in -EPROBE_DEFER case

2016-05-03 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:11:26PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:15:22PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote: > > the driver_data may be used for sanity check, it fails the > > probe() if driver_data is NULL after it is re-triggered. > > for example, soc_probe() in sound/soc/soc-core.

Re: [PATCH] base: dd: don't remove driver_data in -EPROBE_DEFER case

2016-05-03 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:15:22PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote: > the driver_data may be used for sanity check, it fails the > probe() if driver_data is NULL after it is re-triggered. > for example, soc_probe() in sound/soc/soc-core.c > > Signed-off-by: Yi Zhang > --- > drivers/base/dd.c | 3 ++- > 1

[PATCH] base: dd: don't remove driver_data in -EPROBE_DEFER case

2016-03-08 Thread Yi Zhang
the driver_data may be used for sanity check, it fails the probe() if driver_data is NULL after it is re-triggered. for example, soc_probe() in sound/soc/soc-core.c Signed-off-by: Yi Zhang --- drivers/base/dd.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/dd