Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On 01/21/2016 06:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Well, and as you can see from the build robot because a lot of those > > drivers simply don't compile on 64-bit systems. If nothing else you > > would have to push the 32-bit tests downward in

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-22 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On 01/21/2016 06:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Well, and as you can see from the build robot because a lot of those > > drivers simply don't compile on 64-bit systems. If nothing else you > > would have to push the 32-bit tests downward in

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On 01/21/2016 06:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Well, and as you can see from the build robot because a lot of those > drivers simply don't compile on 64-bit systems. If nothing else you > would have to push the 32-bit tests downward in the config dependency tree. > > -hpa Yes, you're

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/21/16 15:43, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On 01/21/2016 02:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> CONFIG_ISA is mainly used to exclude drivers that are for ISA-specific >> devices. >> >> However, PC/104 is indeed an actual ISA parallel bus, and as you say >> widely used in embedded systems.

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On 01/21/2016 02:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > CONFIG_ISA is mainly used to exclude drivers that are for ISA-specific > devices. > > However, PC/104 is indeed an actual ISA parallel bus, and as you say > widely used in embedded systems. However, I would like to see if there > are anything

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi William, [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core] [also build test ERROR on v4.4 next-20160121] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/21/16 07:56, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > Many motherboards utilize a LPC to ISA bridge in order to decode > ISA-style port-mapped I/O addresses. This is particularly true for > embedded motherboards supporting the PC/104 bus (a bus specification > derived from ISA). > > These

[PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread William Breathitt Gray
Many motherboards utilize a LPC to ISA bridge in order to decode ISA-style port-mapped I/O addresses. This is particularly true for embedded motherboards supporting the PC/104 bus (a bus specification derived from ISA). These motherboards are now commonly running 64-bit x86 processors. The X86_32

[PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread William Breathitt Gray
Many motherboards utilize a LPC to ISA bridge in order to decode ISA-style port-mapped I/O addresses. This is particularly true for embedded motherboards supporting the PC/104 bus (a bus specification derived from ISA). These motherboards are now commonly running 64-bit x86 processors. The X86_32

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On 01/21/2016 02:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > CONFIG_ISA is mainly used to exclude drivers that are for ISA-specific > devices. > > However, PC/104 is indeed an actual ISA parallel bus, and as you say > widely used in embedded systems. However, I would like to see if there > are anything

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/21/16 15:43, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On 01/21/2016 02:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> CONFIG_ISA is mainly used to exclude drivers that are for ISA-specific >> devices. >> >> However, PC/104 is indeed an actual ISA parallel bus, and as you say >> widely used in embedded systems.

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On 01/21/2016 06:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Well, and as you can see from the build robot because a lot of those > drivers simply don't compile on 64-bit systems. If nothing else you > would have to push the 32-bit tests downward in the config dependency tree. > > -hpa Yes, you're

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi William, [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core] [also build test ERROR on v4.4 next-20160121] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency

2016-01-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/21/16 07:56, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > Many motherboards utilize a LPC to ISA bridge in order to decode > ISA-style port-mapped I/O addresses. This is particularly true for > embedded motherboards supporting the PC/104 bus (a bus specification > derived from ISA). > > These