Andrew, could you please add this patch to -mm.
As we discussed here, it should be OK for us.
Thanks,
- Bryan Wu
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 11:32 +0800, David McCullough wrote:
>
> Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > On Thu 20 Sep 2007 11:03, David McCullough pondered:
> > > I would say that (a) i
Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> On Thu 20 Sep 2007 11:03, David McCullough pondered:
> > I would say that (a) is definately not the case. I am sure the BF guys
> > will say they have been banging us on the head with changes for a long
> > time and getting no where as we considered the changes
On Thu 20 Sep 2007 11:03, David McCullough pondered:
> I would say that (a) is definately not the case. I am sure the BF guys
> will say they have been banging us on the head with changes for a long
> time and getting no where as we considered the changes to severe or out
> of line.
I don't think
Jivin Paul Mundt lays it down ...
...
> > The other maintainers who have spoken up didn't seem to think this was
> > ugly, or an abuse. I'm surprised to hear language like that when
> > discussing a patch that adds an if statement, a local variable and one
> > parameter in a function call.
> >
Paul Mundt wrote:
This is making API changes where it's convenient for your platform to use
this value, and there's no reason to change the API here at all.
Your proposed addition of flat_validate_relval is an API change, and
very similar in nature to what I've done.
A local variable here is t
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:04:26PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> >I find it a bit disconcerting that blackfin already depends on this
> >in-tree without there being any earlier discussion on making these
> >changes.
>
> Parts of the initial submission were picked up (the includ
Paul Mundt wrote:
I find it a bit disconcerting that blackfin already depends on this
in-tree without there being any earlier discussion on making these
changes.
Parts of the initial submission were picked up (the include/asm
directory), other's weren't. Little we can do about that.
From: David McCullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:55:25 +1000
>
> Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> > > From: Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > This just adds minimum support for the Blackfin relocations,
> > > sinc
Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW - does anyone know Miles Bader's current email address? There isn't one
> listed in MAINTAINERS - and he is still listed for the NEC V850?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Miles
--
Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time. -- Steven Wright
-
To unsubs
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:34 +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 02:08 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> > On Wed 19 Sep 2007 23:54, Paul Mundt pondered:
> > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:42:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On 9/19/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On T
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 02:08 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Wed 19 Sep 2007 23:54, Paul Mundt pondered:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:42:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On 9/19/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:55:25AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
On Wed 19 Sep 2007 23:54, Paul Mundt pondered:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:42:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 9/19/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:55:25AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> > > > Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > > > > On Tue 1
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:42:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:55:25AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> > > Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > > > On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> > > > > This just
On 9/19/07, Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:55:25AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> > Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > > On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> > > > This just adds minimum support for the Blackfin relocations,
> > > > since we don't
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:55:25AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> > > This just adds minimum support for the Blackfin relocations,
> > > since we don't have enough space in each reloc. The idea
> > > is to store
On Wed 19 Sep 2007 21:55, David McCullough pondered:
> Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> > On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> > > From: Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > This just adds minimum support for the Blackfin relocations,
> > > since we don't have enough space in
Jivin Robin Getz lays it down ...
> On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> > From: Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This just adds minimum support for the Blackfin relocations,
> > since we don't have enough space in each reloc. The idea
> > is to store a value with one relocatio
On Tue 18 Sep 2007 04:09, Bryan Wu pondered:
> From: Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This just adds minimum support for the Blackfin relocations,
> since we don't have enough space in each reloc. The idea
> is to store a value with one relocation so that subsequent ones can
> access it.
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
