On 02/03/2014 09:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
"David" == David Milburn writes:
David> When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
David> bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity
David> metadata and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
Looks like Kent
On 02/03/2014 09:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
David == David Milburn dmilb...@redhat.com writes:
David When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
David bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity
David metadata and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
> "David" == David Milburn writes:
David> When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
David> bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity
David> metadata and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
Looks like Kent accidentally broke this when he changed the
David == David Milburn dmilb...@redhat.com writes:
David When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
David bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity
David metadata and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
Looks like Kent accidentally broke this when he
When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity metadata
and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
[3.837493] sd 0:0:17:1089486880: [sda] Enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP
protection
[3.839089] sd 0:0:17:1089486880:
When enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP protection you can hit the
bip_vec full condition which fails to attach the integrity metadata
and returns 0 back to bio_integrity_prep()
[3.837493] sd 0:0:17:1089486880: [sda] Enabling DIX T10-DIF-TYPE1-IP
protection
[3.839089] sd 0:0:17:1089486880:
6 matches
Mail list logo