On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 20:42, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>
>>> From API view, it isn't good to run all hw queues synchronously
>>> in one context, since it isn't correct for multi hw queue case.
>>>
>>> S
On 2014-06-24 20:42, Ming Lei wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
From API view, it isn't good to run all hw queues synchronously
in one context, since it isn't correct for multi hw queue case.
So this patch adds 'async' parameter to blk_mq_start_hw_queue(),
and make blk_
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> From API view, it isn't good to run all hw queues synchronously
> in one context, since it isn't correct for multi hw queue case.
>
> So this patch adds 'async' parameter to blk_mq_start_hw_queue(),
> and make blk_mq_start_hw_queues() to run hw q
>From API view, it isn't good to run all hw queues synchronously
in one context, since it isn't correct for multi hw queue case.
So this patch adds 'async' parameter to blk_mq_start_hw_queue(),
and make blk_mq_start_hw_queues() to run hw queues asynchronously
at default.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei
4 matches
Mail list logo