On 05/11/2015 07:44 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:20:00PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Document when it is safe to call this function for blk-mq queues.
Maybe we should move the queue_lock acquisition into blk_abort_request
for the !blk-mq case? libata and libsas al
Document when it is safe to call this function for blk-mq queues.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche
Cc: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Shaohua Li
---
block/blk-timeout.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-timeout.c b/block/blk-timeout.c
index 246dfb1..d162
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:20:00PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Document when it is safe to call this function for blk-mq queues.
Maybe we should move the queue_lock acquisition into blk_abort_request
for the !blk-mq case? libata and libsas already take it just around the
call, an the usage in
3 matches
Mail list logo
