Re: [PATCH] block: Restore /proc/partitions to not display non-partitionable removable devices

On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:40:32 -0600 Josh Hunt wrote: > On 12/03/2012 06:06 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:56:49 -0800 > > Josh Hunt wrote: > > > >> We found with newer kernels we started seeing the cdrom device showing > >> up in /proc/partitions, but it was not there before.

Re: [PATCH] block: Restore /proc/partitions to not display non-partitionable removable devices

On 12/03/2012 06:06 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:56:49 -0800 Josh Hunt wrote: We found with newer kernels we started seeing the cdrom device showing up in /proc/partitions, but it was not there before. Looking into this I found that commit d27769ec... block: add GENHD_FL_NO_

Re: [PATCH] block: Restore /proc/partitions to not display non-partitionable removable devices

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:56:49 -0800 Josh Hunt wrote: > We found with newer kernels we started seeing the cdrom device showing > up in /proc/partitions, but it was not there before. Looking into this I found > that commit d27769ec... block: add GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN introduces this > change > in b

Re: [PATCH] block: Restore /proc/partitions to not display non-partitionable removable devices

ping? On 11/19/2012 08:56 PM, Josh Hunt wrote: We found with newer kernels we started seeing the cdrom device showing up in /proc/partitions, but it was not there before. Looking into this I found that commit d27769ec... block: add GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN introduces this change in behavior. It's n

[PATCH] block: Restore /proc/partitions to not display non-partitionable removable devices

We found with newer kernels we started seeing the cdrom device showing up in /proc/partitions, but it was not there before. Looking into this I found that commit d27769ec... block: add GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN introduces this change in behavior. It's not clear to me from the commit's changelog if this