On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:16:38 -0800
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:15:44 -0500
> Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> > Fix a build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, by defining
> > a wrapper called blk_part_pack_uuid(). The wrapper returns
> > -EINVAL, when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined.
>
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:15:44 -0500
Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Fix a build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, by defining
> a wrapper called blk_part_pack_uuid(). The wrapper returns
> -EINVAL, when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined.
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:538:4: error: implicit declara
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Fix a build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, by defining
> a wrapper called blk_part_pack_uuid(). The wrapper returns
> -EINVAL, when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined.
Please indicate which tree your patches are intended for, also noting
specific regre
On 02/24/13 07:15, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Fix a build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, by defining
> a wrapper called blk_part_pack_uuid(). The wrapper returns
> -EINVAL, when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined.
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:538:4: error: implicit declaration
> of function
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Fix a build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, by defining
> a wrapper called blk_part_pack_uuid(). The wrapper returns
> -EINVAL, when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined.
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:538:4: error: implicit declaration
> of funct
Fix a build error when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled, by defining
a wrapper called blk_part_pack_uuid(). The wrapper returns
-EINVAL, when CONFIG_BLOCK is not defined.
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:538:4: error: implicit declaration
of function 'part_pack_uuid' [-Werror=implicit-function-decl
6 matches
Mail list logo