Re: [PATCH] boot_delay should only affect output

2012-11-21 Thread Andrew Cooks
Hi Joe On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:50 +0800, Andrew Cooks wrote: >> The boot_delay parameter affects all printk(), even if the log level >> prevents visible output from the call. It results in delays greater >> than the user intended without pu

Re: [PATCH] boot_delay should only affect output

2012-11-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 11/12/2012 10:50 PM, Andrew Cooks wrote: > The boot_delay parameter affects all printk(), even if the log level > prevents visible output from the call. It results in delays greater > than the user intended without purpose. > > This patch changes the behaviour of boot_delay to only delay out

[PATCH] boot_delay should only affect output

2012-11-12 Thread Andrew Cooks
The boot_delay parameter affects all printk(), even if the log level prevents visible output from the call. It results in delays greater than the user intended without purpose. This patch changes the behaviour of boot_delay to only delay output. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooks --- kernel/printk.c