On 12/22/2017 07:12 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
> This checks that it is not possible to bypass the total stack size check in
> update_stack_depth() by calling a function that uses a large amount of
> stack memory *before* using a large amount of stack memory in the caller.
>
> Currently, the first
On 12/22/2017 07:12 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
> This checks that it is not possible to bypass the total stack size check in
> update_stack_depth() by calling a function that uses a large amount of
> stack memory *before* using a large amount of stack memory in the caller.
>
> Currently, the first
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:12:35PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> This checks that it is not possible to bypass the total stack size check in
> update_stack_depth() by calling a function that uses a large amount of
> stack memory *before* using a large amount of stack memory in the caller.
>
>
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:12:35PM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> This checks that it is not possible to bypass the total stack size check in
> update_stack_depth() by calling a function that uses a large amount of
> stack memory *before* using a large amount of stack memory in the caller.
>
>
This checks that it is not possible to bypass the total stack size check in
update_stack_depth() by calling a function that uses a large amount of
stack memory *before* using a large amount of stack memory in the caller.
Currently, the first added testcase causes a rejection as expected, but
the
This checks that it is not possible to bypass the total stack size check in
update_stack_depth() by calling a function that uses a large amount of
stack memory *before* using a large amount of stack memory in the caller.
Currently, the first added testcase causes a rejection as expected, but
the
6 matches
Mail list logo
