On 11 July 2017 at 17:01, Russell Joyce wrote:
> Thanks for your comments.
>
>> What I think Rafał is saying is that it would be better to have this
>> code in cfg80211 so other drivers including mac80211 could use it.
>
>
> While I agree that moving all wireless LED triggers to cfg80211 would be
Thanks for your comments.
> What I think Rafał is saying is that it would be better to have this
> code in cfg80211 so other drivers including mac80211 could use it.
While I agree that moving all wireless LED triggers to cfg80211 would be an
ideal situation, it seems a bit out of scope for what
On 10-07-17 19:02, Russell Joyce wrote:
>> 1) I think most of it should be some cfg80211 shareable code.
>
> I’m not sure exactly what you mean by this, could you please clarify?
What I think Rafał is saying is that it would be better to have this
code in cfg80211 so other drivers including mac80
> 1) I think most of it should be some cfg80211 shareable code.
I’m not sure exactly what you mean by this, could you please clarify?
> 2) This "rxtx" while surely present in other places sounds like a
> workaround for LED subsystem limitation. Maybe it's time to finally
> rework LED triggers.
I
On 7 July 2017 at 16:09, Russell Joyce wrote:
> Add three basic LED triggers to brcmfmac, based on those in mac80211: one
> for transmit, one for receive, and one for combined transmit/receive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell Joyce
1) I think most of it should be some cfg80211 shareable code.
2) This
Add three basic LED triggers to brcmfmac, based on those in mac80211: one
for transmit, one for receive, and one for combined transmit/receive.
Signed-off-by: Russell Joyce
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/Kconfig| 12 +++
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile | 2
6 matches
Mail list logo
