On 29-9-2016 23:57, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27 September 2016 at 11:24, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van
On 29-9-2016 23:57, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27 September 2016 at 11:24, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 26-9-2016 12:23,
On 27 September 2016 at 11:24, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>>> wrote:
On 27 September 2016 at 11:24, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>>> wrote:
On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
On 26-9-2016 14:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any
On 26-9-2016 16:59, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
On 26-9-2016 16:59, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rafał Miłecki
> > >
> > > We need to track 802.1x packets to
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rafał Miłecki
> > >
> > > We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending
> > > ones
> > > for
On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>>
>>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if
On 26 September 2016 at 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>>
>>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
>>> for transmission. This is required
On 26-9-2016 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>>
>>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
On 26-9-2016 14:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
> wrote:
>> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>>
>>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
>>> for transmission. This is required for
On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>
>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
>> for transmission. This is required for
On 26 September 2016 at 13:46, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>
>> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
>> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
>> firmware.
>
> The problem
On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
> firmware.
The problem we are trying to solve is a pretty old one.
On 26-9-2016 12:23, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
> for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
> firmware.
The problem we are trying to solve is a pretty old one. The problem is
that
From: Rafał Miłecki
We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
firmware.
Unfortunately our old tracking code wasn't very accurate. It was
treating skb as pending as soon as it was
From: Rafał Miłecki
We need to track 802.1x packets to know if there are any pending ones
for transmission. This is required for performing key update in the
firmware.
Unfortunately our old tracking code wasn't very accurate. It was
treating skb as pending as soon as it was passed by the netif.
20 matches
Mail list logo