On Thursday 08 October 2015 04:42:53 David Miller wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 21:22:12 +0200
>
> > With the ARM mini2440_defconfig, the bridge netfilter code gets
> > built with both CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 and CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6
> > disabled, which leads to a harmless
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 21:22:12 +0200
> With the ARM mini2440_defconfig, the bridge netfilter code gets
> built with both CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 and CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6
> disabled, which leads to a harmless gcc warning:
>
> net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c: In function 'br_nf
On 10/06/2015 09:39 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 21:28:29 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> I posted a fix for this a couple of days ago, but I like your approach
>> better.
>> Since mine is not yet applied (I sent it to netfilter-devel only, wasn't
>> sure which
>> jurisdict
On Tuesday 06 October 2015 21:28:29 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> I posted a fix for this a couple of days ago, but I like your approach better.
> Since mine is not yet applied (I sent it to netfilter-devel only, wasn't sure
> which
> jurisdiction this falls into exactly) we can drop it.
> Just for
On 10/06/2015 09:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With the ARM mini2440_defconfig, the bridge netfilter code gets
> built with both CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 and CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6
> disabled, which leads to a harmless gcc warning:
>
> net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c: In function 'br_nf_dev_queue_xmit
With the ARM mini2440_defconfig, the bridge netfilter code gets
built with both CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4 and CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6
disabled, which leads to a harmless gcc warning:
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c: In function 'br_nf_dev_queue_xmit':
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c:792:2: warning: labe
6 matches
Mail list logo