Hi Herbert,
Were there any reasons I might not be aware of which prevented you
from adding the same change you introduced in
"bridge: Only flood unregistered groups to routers" for IPv6, too?
If not and if no one else comes up with any objection, then I'd
still be happy if this patch could find
Hi Herbert,
Were there any reasons I might not be aware of which prevented you
from adding the same change you introduced in
bridge: Only flood unregistered groups to routers for IPv6, too?
If not and if no one else comes up with any objection, then I'd
still be happy if this patch could find
Currently if there is no listener for a certain group then IPv6 packets
for that group are flooded on all ports, even though there might be no
host and router interested in it on a port.
With this commit they are only forwarded to ports with a multicast
router.
Just like commit bd4265fe36
Currently if there is no listener for a certain group then IPv6 packets
for that group are flooded on all ports, even though there might be no
host and router interested in it on a port.
With this commit they are only forwarded to ports with a multicast
router.
Just like commit bd4265fe36
4 matches
Mail list logo
