Re: [PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor

2015-03-10 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
On 03/10/2015 04:48 AM, Florian Westphal wrote: > It is identical to the can destructor. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Thanks, applied to can-next. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions| Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |

[PATCH] can: use sock_efree instead of own destructor

2015-03-09 Thread Florian Westphal
It is identical to the can destructor. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal --- include/linux/can/skb.h | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/can/skb.h b/include/linux/can/skb.h index cc00d15..b6a52a4 100644 --- a/include/linux/can/skb.h +++ b/include