Hi,
I can't find this patch appear in any tree, is there any problem?
As Michal Hocko's suggestion, I resent this patch with stable tag added. Please
review.
Thanks.
On 2014/9/18 9:38, Wang Nan wrote:
> Commit ff7ee93f4 introduces kmemleak_alloc() for alloc_page_cgroup(),
> but corresponding k
On Thu 18-09-14 09:38:05, Wang Nan wrote:
> Commit ff7ee93f4 introduces kmemleak_alloc() for alloc_page_cgroup(),
> but corresponding kmemleak_free() is missing, which makes kmemleak be
> wrongly disabled after memory offlining. Log is pasted at the end of
> this commit message.
>
> This patch add
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:16:39 -0400
Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
>
> Should this go into -stable? I'm inclined to say no, this has been
> busted since Steve's other kmemleak fix since 2011, and that change
> also didn't go into -stable.
It only breaks kmem tests, and sin
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:38:05AM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> Commit ff7ee93f4 introduces kmemleak_alloc() for alloc_page_cgroup(),
> but corresponding kmemleak_free() is missing, which makes kmemleak be
> wrongly disabled after memory offlining. Log is pasted at the end of
> this commit message.
>
Commit ff7ee93f4 introduces kmemleak_alloc() for alloc_page_cgroup(),
but corresponding kmemleak_free() is missing, which makes kmemleak be
wrongly disabled after memory offlining. Log is pasted at the end of
this commit message.
This patch add kmemleak_free() into free_page_cgroup(). During page
5 matches
Mail list logo