Hello,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11:05AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Right, but that should be safe. The css objects of the root cgroup are
> allocated at boot, and won't be destroyed at umount.
>
> Furthermore when a cgroup hierarchy is going to be unmounted, those css's
> will be made to point
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11:05AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
Right, but that should be safe. The css objects of the root cgroup are
allocated at boot, and won't be destroyed at umount.
Furthermore when a cgroup hierarchy is going to be unmounted, those css's
will be made to point to a
On 2012/7/8 14:35, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Li.
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:19:15PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> I think we're horridly broken for
>>> root cgroup tho - and it has been broken for very long time. I think
>>> it's mostly hidden because most (all?) controllers short-circuit root
On 2012/7/8 14:35, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Li.
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:19:15PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
I think we're horridly broken for
root cgroup tho - and it has been broken for very long time. I think
it's mostly hidden because most (all?) controllers short-circuit root
cgroup.
Hello, Li.
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:19:15PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > I think we're horridly broken for
> > root cgroup tho - and it has been broken for very long time. I think
> > it's mostly hidden because most (all?) controllers short-circuit root
> > cgroup. Eh, well
> >
>
> Could
Hello, Li.
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 02:19:15PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
I think we're horridly broken for
root cgroup tho - and it has been broken for very long time. I think
it's mostly hidden because most (all?) controllers short-circuit root
cgroup. Eh, well
Could you
6 matches
Mail list logo
