> I'll get around to adding tests for your
> cases soonish.
You could also just apply my patch?
AFAIK it works fine.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.o
On Sat, 2013-08-31 at 16:31 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > A similar patch was suggested by Andi Kleen
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/5/648
>
> My patch checked for const <-> initdata / non const initconst mistakes.
>
> I don't think your patch does that?
Hi Andi.
No it doesn't.
This patch is
> A similar patch was suggested by Andi Kleen
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/5/648
My patch checked for const <-> initdata / non const initconst mistakes.
I don't think your patch does that?
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
As discussed recently on the arm [1] and lm-sensors [2] lists, it is
possible to use section markers on variables in a way which gcc doesn't
understand (or at least not the way the developer intended):
static struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {
does NOT put exynos4_plls
4 matches
Mail list logo