On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 11:26:59AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> I'll post it again as a reply to this email with a
> with a sign-off and a better commit description and
> Linus/Andrew can decide if it's better to revert
> f5f613259f3f or apply it separately.
Gentle reminder on this, it is the last
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 20:15 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Joe,
rehi Geert
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 6:07 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 16:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[]
> > > This is now commit f5f613259f3fea81 ("checkpatch: allow not using -f
> > > with files t
Hi Joe,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 6:07 PM Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 16:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:12 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > > If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> > > flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch wil
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 16:03 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:12 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> > If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> > flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
> > assuming it's a patch and emit:
> >
Hi Joe,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:12 AM Joe Perches wrote:
> If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
> assuming it's a patch and emit:
>
> ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
>
> Change the b
On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 17:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
> assuming it's a patch and emit:
>
> ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
>
> Change the behavi
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 14:23 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 25/08/2020 02.09, Joe Perches wrote:
> > If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> > flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
> > assuming it's a patch
[]
> > +sub git_is_single_file {
> > +
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 14:23 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 25/08/2020 02.09, Joe Perches wrote:
> > If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> > flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
> > assuming it's a patch and emit:
> >
> > ERROR: Does not appear
On 25/08/2020 02.09, Joe Perches wrote:
> If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
> flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
> assuming it's a patch and emit:
>
> ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
>
> Change the behavior to assume t
If a file exists in git and checkpatch is used without the -f
flag for scanning a file, then checkpatch will scan the file
assuming it's a patch and emit:
ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
Change the behavior to assume the -f flag if the file exists
in git.
Signed-off-by:
10 matches
Mail list logo