On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 13:40 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> Ping? Joe? Andy? Where are we at with this patch?
I think there's a patch in Andrew Morton's queue for this.
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 13:40 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> Ping? Joe? Andy? Where are we at with this patch?
I think there's a patch in Andrew Morton's queue for this.
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 13:27 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> When users run checkpatch.pl with --no-tree option, $root is not
> defined, which causes an ugly warning that it is not initialized at
> line 764. The test for whether or not a file is maintained should
> only be run when a kernel tree is
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 13:27 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> When users run checkpatch.pl with --no-tree option, $root is not
> defined, which causes an ugly warning that it is not initialized at
> line 764. The test for whether or not a file is maintained should
> only be run when a kernel tree is
When users run checkpatch.pl with --no-tree option, $root is not
defined, which causes an ugly warning that it is not initialized at
line 764. The test for whether or not a file is maintained should
only be run when a kernel tree is defined (i.e. not when --no-tree
option is being used)
When users run checkpatch.pl with --no-tree option, $root is not
defined, which causes an ugly warning that it is not initialized at
line 764. The test for whether or not a file is maintained should
only be run when a kernel tree is defined (i.e. not when --no-tree
option is being used)
6 matches
Mail list logo
