Andy Whitcroft wrote:
It truly is not clear what "type" of thing an __asm__ is these days.
Cirtainly it seems we can use it as an attribute of a type:
register unsigned long __r16 __asm__("$16") = rtc_access->function;
and yet also in its more traditional form:
__asm__("
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:17:28PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> checkpatch.pl thinks that __asm__ is a function name, so it complains about
> a space between the function name and a parenthesis when it sees
> "__asm__ ("mov ax,bx")".
>
> This change will also encourage developers to use '__asm__'
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:17:28PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
checkpatch.pl thinks that __asm__ is a function name, so it complains about
a space between the function name and a parenthesis when it sees
__asm__ (mov ax,bx).
This change will also encourage developers to use '__asm__' instead of
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
It truly is not clear what type of thing an __asm__ is these days.
Cirtainly it seems we can use it as an attribute of a type:
register unsigned long __r16 __asm__($16) = rtc_access-function;
and yet also in its more traditional form:
__asm__( call
checkpatch.pl thinks that __asm__ is a function name, so it complains about
a space between the function name and a parenthesis when it sees
"__asm__ ("mov ax,bx")".
This change will also encourage developers to use '__asm__' instead of 'asm'.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
checkpatch.pl thinks that __asm__ is a function name, so it complains about
a space between the function name and a parenthesis when it sees
__asm__ (mov ax,bx).
This change will also encourage developers to use '__asm__' instead of 'asm'.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
