Re: [PATCH] clk: divider: Introduce CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO flag

2013-04-03 Thread Sören Brinkmann
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:40:27AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Soren Brinkmann (2013-04-02 15:36:56) > > Dividers which have CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED set have a redundant state, > > being a divider value of zero. Some hardware implementations allow a > > zero divider which simply doesn't

Re: [PATCH] clk: divider: Introduce CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO flag

2013-04-03 Thread Sören Brinkmann
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:40:27AM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Soren Brinkmann (2013-04-02 15:36:56) Dividers which have CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED set have a redundant state, being a divider value of zero. Some hardware implementations allow a zero divider which simply doesn't alter

[PATCH] clk: divider: Introduce CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO flag

2013-04-02 Thread Soren Brinkmann
Dividers which have CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED set have a redundant state, being a divider value of zero. Some hardware implementations allow a zero divider which simply doesn't alter the frequency. I.e. it acts like a divide by one or bypassing the divider. This flag is used to handle such HW in the

[PATCH] clk: divider: Introduce CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO flag

2013-04-02 Thread Soren Brinkmann
Dividers which have CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED set have a redundant state, being a divider value of zero. Some hardware implementations allow a zero divider which simply doesn't alter the frequency. I.e. it acts like a divide by one or bypassing the divider. This flag is used to handle such HW in the