Re: [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()

2018-02-12 22:00 GMT+01:00 Russell King - ARM Linux : > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:51:57PM -0600, David Lechner wrote: >> On 02/12/2018 08:24 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> >From: Bartosz Golaszewski >> > >> >The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when >> >converting the TI

Re: [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()

On 02/12/2018 03:00 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:51:57PM -0600, David Lechner wrote: On 02/12/2018 08:24 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: From: Bartosz Golaszewski The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when converting the TI DaVinci platfor

Re: [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:51:57PM -0600, David Lechner wrote: > On 02/12/2018 08:24 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > >The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when > >converting the TI DaVinci platform to using the common clock framework. > > > >

Re: [PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()

On 02/12/2018 08:24 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: From: Bartosz Golaszewski The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when converting the TI DaVinci platform to using the common clock framework. Current kernel supports booting DaVinci boards both in device tree as well as leg

[PATCH] clk: don't call __of_clk_get_by_name() unnecessarily from clk_get()

From: Bartosz Golaszewski The way this function is implemented caused some confusion when converting the TI DaVinci platform to using the common clock framework. Current kernel supports booting DaVinci boards both in device tree as well as legacy, board-file mode. In the latter, we always end up