Re: [PATCH] clk: h8300: Migrate to clk_hw based registration APIs

2016-08-24 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/16, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Yoshinori Sato

Re: [PATCH] clk: h8300: Migrate to clk_hw based registration APIs

2016-08-24 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/16, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we > can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in > these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of > consumer and provider clk APIs. > > Cc: Yoshinori Sato > Cc: >

[PATCH] clk: h8300: Migrate to clk_hw based registration APIs

2016-08-16 Thread Stephen Boyd
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. Cc: Yoshinori Sato Cc:

[PATCH] clk: h8300: Migrate to clk_hw based registration APIs

2016-08-16 Thread Stephen Boyd
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of consumer and provider clk APIs. Cc: Yoshinori Sato Cc: Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd ---