On 08/16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
> can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
> these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
> consumer and provider clk APIs.
>
> Cc: Yoshinori Sato
On 08/16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
> can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
> these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
> consumer and provider clk APIs.
>
> Cc: Yoshinori Sato
> Cc:
>
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
consumer and provider clk APIs.
Cc: Yoshinori Sato
Cc:
Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
consumer and provider clk APIs.
Cc: Yoshinori Sato
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
4 matches
Mail list logo