On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:40:35PM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:41:29AM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
> > Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:40:35PM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:41:29AM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:41:29AM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
> Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver
I will squash this into the next tegra-clk-next as
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:41:29AM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver pdeschrij...@nvidia.com
I will squash this into the
On 10/31/2013 09:41 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >>> Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on
On 10/31/2013 09:41 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:50:03PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref
On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
>>> Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 09:41 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> > On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
> > > Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
> > Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
>
> Why? What benefit does this give,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 09:41 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
> On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
> > Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
>
> Why? What benefit does this give,
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
> Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Why? What benefit does this give, or what bug does this fix?
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Why? What benefit does this give, or what bug does this fix?
diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 09:41 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Why? What benefit does this give, or
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Why? What benefit does this give, or what
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:44:10PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 30.10.2013, 09:41 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry
On 10/30/2013 04:18 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/29/2013 06:41 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c |7 ---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c |3 ++-
2 files changed, 6
Use pll_ref instead of pll_re_vco as the pll_e parent on Tegra114 and
Tegra124. Also add a pll_ref table entry for pll_e for Tegra114.
Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver pdeschrij...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c |7 ---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c |3 ++-
2
20 matches
Mail list logo