* Nathan Chancellor [190412 05:00]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:56:57PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Daniel Lezcano [190411 19:21]:
> > > On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
> > > >> can you ask for an
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:56:57PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Daniel Lezcano [190411 19:21]:
> > On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
> > >> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
> > >
> > > I
Hi,
* Daniel Lezcano [190411 19:21]:
> On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
> >> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
> >
> > I certainly do ask and wait for acks where possible :)
>
> Ok, I may have missed
Hi,
* Daniel Lezcano [190411 20:13]:
> I can see those fixes in timers/core:
>
> Fixes: 592ea6bd1fad ("clocksource: timer-ti-dm: Make unexported
> functions static")
Hmm so this one was over a year ago related to the PWM series :)
> Fixes: 008258d995a6 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Make
On 11/04/2019 21:36, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
>>>
>>> I certainly
On 11/04/2019 21:36, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
>>>
>>> I certainly
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
> >> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
> >
> > I certainly do ask and wait for acks where possible :)
>
>
On 10/04/2019 22:07, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
>> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
>
> I certainly do ask and wait for acks where possible :)
Ok, I may have missed them.
> Note that I have not applied this patch. I just
Hi,
* Daniel Lezcano [190410 17:02]:
> can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
I certainly do ask and wait for acks where possible :)
Note that I have not applied this patch. I just added
Keerthy to Cc on this thread so maybe you misread the
message earlier. My comment
Hi Tony,
can you ask for an acked-by before pulling a patch in your tree?
On 04/04/2019 16:17, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ladislav Michl [190327 08:12]:
>> Hello Nathan,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:01:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> Commit 008258d995a6
On 04/04/19 7:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Ladislav Michl [190327 08:12]:
Hello Nathan,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:01:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
Commit 008258d995a6 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Make
omap_dm_timer_set_load_start() static") made omap_dm_time_set_load_start
* Ladislav Michl [190327 08:12]:
> Hello Nathan,
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:01:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Commit 008258d995a6 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Make
> > omap_dm_timer_set_load_start() static") made omap_dm_time_set_load_start
> > static because its prototype
Hello Nathan,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:01:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Commit 008258d995a6 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Make
> omap_dm_timer_set_load_start() static") made omap_dm_time_set_load_start
> static because its prototype was not defined in a header. Unfortunately,
>
Commit 008258d995a6 ("clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Make
omap_dm_timer_set_load_start() static") made omap_dm_time_set_load_start
static because its prototype was not defined in a header. Unfortunately,
this causes a build warning on multi_v7_defconfig because this function
is not used anywhere
14 matches
Mail list logo
