On Sat, 26 Dec 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 12/26/2015 11:24 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > The conclusion seems to be that it is useful to override the value, so we
> > can just drop this semantic patch.
>
>No! As I said, unconditionally overriding an error value breaks the
> deferred
On 12/26/2015 11:24 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
The conclusion seems to be that it is useful to override the value, so we
can just drop this semantic patch.
No! As I said, unconditionally overriding an error value breaks the
deferred probing. It's actually a bug to override it, so the patch se
The conclusion seems to be that it is useful to override the value, so we
can just drop this semantic patch.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majord
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 12/26/2015 10:24 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > The error return value of platform_get_irq seems to often get dropped.
>
>Maybe it was intentional (see my recent follow-up to your netdev patch).
> But if an error gets unconditionally overriden,
On 12/26/2015 10:24 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
The error return value of platform_get_irq seems to often get dropped.
Maybe it was intentional (see my recent follow-up to your netdev patch).
But if an error gets unconditionally overriden, deferred probing can't work.
So your patches seem goo
The error return value of platform_get_irq seems to often get dropped.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq_return.cocci | 53 ++
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_get_irq_return.cocci
b/scripts/coccinell
6 matches
Mail list logo