[PATCH] compat USB ioctl take II was Re: compat ioctl for submiting URB

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:33:31AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Issues: > - Should use CONFIG_COMPAT, not x86-64 specific symbols Fixed. > - Why can't you set URB_COMPAT transparently in the emulation > layer? Then existing applications would hopefully work without > changes, right? Now I see it.

[PATCH] compat USB ioctl take II was Re: compat ioctl for submiting URB

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:33:31AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: Issues: - Should use CONFIG_COMPAT, not x86-64 specific symbols Fixed. - Why can't you set URB_COMPAT transparently in the emulation layer? Then existing applications would hopefully work without changes, right? Now I see it. That