On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:29:29 -0400 (EDT) Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > or
> >
> > you->kristen->Len->mainline
> >|
> >v
> > -mm
> >
> > or something else.
>
> My apologies, it wasn't entirely clear to me
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
> Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> > > > Sorry, it took me a few days to get to
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:29:29 -0400 (EDT) Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or
you-kristen-Len-mainline
|
v
-mm
or something else.
My apologies, it wasn't entirely clear to me that that was happening
On Wed, 9 May 2007 16:24:30 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
> Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> > > Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
> > >
> > > but I
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
but I had to make a
On Wed, 9 May 2007 16:24:30 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
Sorry, it took me a few
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> > Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
> > but I had to make a couple of tweaks to avoid a hang when rmmod'ing a
> > board driver. The board
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
but I had to make a couple of tweaks to avoid a hang when rmmod'ing a
board driver. The board drivers do:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
> Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
> but I had to make a couple of tweaks to avoid a hang when rmmod'ing a
> board driver. The board drivers do:
>
> cpci_hp_stop()
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:07:49PM -0400, Scott Murray wrote:
Sorry, it took me a few days to get to testing this out. It looks good,
but I had to make a couple of tweaks to avoid a hang when rmmod'ing a
board driver. The board drivers do:
cpci_hp_stop()
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:55:29AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
> >
> > kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
> > during thread startup.
> >
> > Calls to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:55:29AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:55:29AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
> >
> > kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
> > during thread startup.
> >
> > Calls to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:55:29AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:55:29AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
>
> kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
> during thread startup.
>
> Calls to signal_pending were also removed as it is currently
> impossible for
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:55:29AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also removed as it is currently
impossible for the
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also removed as it is currently
impossible for the cpci_hotplug thread to receive signals.
CC: Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also removed as it is currently
impossible for the cpci_hotplug thread to receive signals.
CC: Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also removed as it is currently
impossible for the cpci_hotplug thread to receive signals.
CC: Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kthread_run replaces the kernel_thread and daemonize calls
during thread startup.
Calls to signal_pending were also removed as it is currently
impossible for the cpci_hotplug thread to receive signals.
CC: Scott Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by:
22 matches
Mail list logo
