On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:34:21 AM Pan Xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui
>
> This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed2734 ("[CPUFREQ]
> return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an error
> on obviously incorrect limits when we echo xxx >.../scaling_max,min_freq
>
On 28-07-15, 11:34, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui
>
> This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed2734 ("[CPUFREQ]
> return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an error
> on obviously incorrect limits when we echo xxx >.../scaling_max,min_freq
> Actually we just
hi, Viresh
thanks for your quick reply! :)
On 2015年07月28日 12:41, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28-07-15, 11:34, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> From: Pan Xinhui
>>
>> This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed2734 ("[CPUFREQ]
>> return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an er
On 28-07-15, 11:34, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui
>
> This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed2734 ("[CPUFREQ]
> return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an error
> on obviously incorrect limits when we echo xxx >.../scaling_max,min_freq
> Actually we just
From: Pan Xinhui
This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed2734 ("[CPUFREQ]
return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an error
on obviously incorrect limits when we echo xxx >.../scaling_max,min_freq
Actually we just need check if new_policy->min > new_policy->max.
B
5 matches
Mail list logo