On Friday, August 18, 2017 6:19:44 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-08-17, 17:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> > > the function pointer is saved by
On Friday, August 18, 2017 6:19:44 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-08-17, 17:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> > > the function pointer is saved by
On 17-08-17, 17:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> > the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
> > better if the callers fill it
On 17-08-17, 17:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> > the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
> > better if the callers fill it
On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
> better if the callers fill it themselves, as they can do it from the
>
On Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:04:48 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
> the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
> better if the callers fill it themselves, as they can do it from the
>
The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
better if the callers fill it themselves, as they can do it from the
governor->init() callback then, which is called only once per policy
lifetime rather
The callers already have the structure (struct update_util_data) where
the function pointer is saved by cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(). And its
better if the callers fill it themselves, as they can do it from the
governor->init() callback then, which is called only once per policy
lifetime rather
8 matches
Mail list logo