On 18-09-17, 10:39, Bo Yan wrote:
> Currently, the "last_index" is being checked before
> cpufreq_stats_update(stats) inside function
> "cpufreq_stats_record_transition", so it's taken care of.
>
> However, the function "show_time_in_state" also calls cpufreq_stats_update,
> the similar check shou
On 09/17/2017 06:50 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 15-09-17, 13:13, Bo Yan wrote:
It is possible for last_index to get a -1 if current frequency
is not found in the freq table when stats is created. If the
function "cpufreq_stats_update" is called before last_index is
updated with a valid value, the
On 15-09-17, 13:13, Bo Yan wrote:
> It is possible for last_index to get a -1 if current frequency
> is not found in the freq table when stats is created. If the
> function "cpufreq_stats_update" is called before last_index is
> updated with a valid value, the "-1" will be used as index to
> update
It is possible for last_index to get a -1 if current frequency
is not found in the freq table when stats is created. If the
function "cpufreq_stats_update" is called before last_index is
updated with a valid value, the "-1" will be used as index to
update stats->time_in_state, triggering an excepti
4 matches
Mail list logo
