> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 7:19 AM
> To: Linux PM list
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Viresh Kumar; Chen, Yu C
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Change confusing struct field an
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 7:19 AM
> To: Linux PM list
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Viresh Kumar; Chen, Yu C
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Change confusing struct field an
On 28-04-16, 01:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The name of the prev_cpu_wall field in struct cpu_dbs_info is
> confusing, because it doesn't represent wall time, but the previous
> update time as returned by get_cpu_idle_time() (that may be
On 28-04-16, 01:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> The name of the prev_cpu_wall field in struct cpu_dbs_info is
> confusing, because it doesn't represent wall time, but the previous
> update time as returned by get_cpu_idle_time() (that may be the
> current value of
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The name of the prev_cpu_wall field in struct cpu_dbs_info is
confusing, because it doesn't represent wall time, but the previous
update time as returned by get_cpu_idle_time() (that may be the
current value of jiffies_64 in some cases, for
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
The name of the prev_cpu_wall field in struct cpu_dbs_info is
confusing, because it doesn't represent wall time, but the previous
update time as returned by get_cpu_idle_time() (that may be the
current value of jiffies_64 in some cases, for example).
Moreover, the names
6 matches
Mail list logo