On Mon 2014-06-09 10:54:17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
> friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).
>
> It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
> integer value and can be
On 9 June 2014 12:36, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 10:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Well, to be honest, I'm not a great fan of writing tricky code (i.e.,
> overloading multiple semantics onto one single thing). However, in this case,
I am somewhat, but it shouldn't be confusing at
On 06/09/2014 10:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
> friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).
>
> It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
> integer value and can be used
On 06/09/2014 10:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).
It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
integer value and can be used instead
On 9 June 2014 12:36, Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 06/09/2014 10:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Well, to be honest, I'm not a great fan of writing tricky code (i.e.,
overloading multiple semantics onto one single thing). However, in this case,
I am somewhat, but it
On Mon 2014-06-09 10:54:17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).
It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
integer value and can be used
'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).
It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
integer value and can be used instead of 'copy_prev_load' by setting it to zero
when
'copy_prev_load' was recently added by commit: 18b46ab (cpufreq: governor: Be
friendly towards latency-sensitive bursty workloads).
It actually is a bit redundant as we also have 'prev_load' which can store any
integer value and can be used instead of 'copy_prev_load' by setting it to zero
when
8 matches
Mail list logo