Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add additional OOB enabling bit

2020-06-12 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 07:11 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2020.06.11 10:49 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > Add additional bit for OOB (Out of band) enabling of P-states. In > > this > > case intel_pstate shouldn't load. Currently, only "BIT(8) == 1" of > > the > > MSR MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT is cons

RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add additional OOB enabling bit

2020-06-12 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2020.06.11 10:49 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > Add additional bit for OOB (Out of band) enabling of P-states. In this > case intel_pstate shouldn't load. Currently, only "BIT(8) == 1" of the > MSR MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT is considered as OOB. Also add "BIT(18) == 1" as > OOB condition. Shouldn't thos

[PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add additional OOB enabling bit

2020-06-11 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
Add additional bit for OOB (Out of band) enabling of P-states. In this case intel_pstate shouldn't load. Currently, only "BIT(8) == 1" of the MSR MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT is considered as OOB. Also add "BIT(18) == 1" as OOB condition. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.