Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-17 Thread Francisco Jerez
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 8:53 AM Francisco Jerez wrote: >> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >> >> > On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:35:15 PM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: >> >> >> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >> >> >> >> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:20:08 AM C

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 8:53 AM Francisco Jerez wrote: > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:35:15 PM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: > >> > >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > >> > >> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:20:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: > >> > > >> >

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-14 Thread Francisco Jerez
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:35:15 PM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: >> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: >> >> > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:20:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: >> > >> >> Srinivas Pandruvada writes: >> >>=20 >> >> > [...] >> >> > >> >> >> > >

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:35:15 PM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:20:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: > > > >> Srinivas Pandruvada writes: > >>=20 > >> > [...] > >> > > >> >> > >=3D20 > >> >> > > This patch causes a numb

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-11 Thread Francisco Jerez
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:20:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: >> >> --==-=-= >> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" >> >> --=-=-= >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> Content-Disposition: inline >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-prin

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, September 6, 2018 6:20:08 AM CEST Francisco Jerez wrote: > > --==-=-= > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" > > --=-=-= > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Srinivas Pandruvada writes:

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, September 3, 2018 5:10:27 PM CEST Eero Tamminen wrote: > Hi, > > On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > ... > > As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the patchset > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/ > > But he has to watch results for severa

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, August 31, 2018 7:28:51 PM CEST Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > The io_boost mechanism, when scheduler update util callback indicates wake > from IO was intended for short term boost to improve disk IO performance. > But once i915 graphics driver changed to io-schedule_timeout() from > sche

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-05 Thread Francisco Jerez
Srinivas Pandruvada writes: > [...] > >> > > >> > > This patch causes a number of statistically significant >> > > regressions >> > > (with significance of 1%) on the two systems I've tested it >> > > on. On >> > > my >> > >> > Sure. These patches are targeted to Atom clients where some of >>

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-04 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
[...] > > > > > > This patch causes a number of statistically significant > > > regressions > > > (with significance of 1%) on the two systems I've tested it > > > on. On > > > my > > > > Sure. These patches are targeted to Atom clients where some of > > these > > server like workload may hav

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-04 Thread Francisco Jerez
Srinivas Pandruvada writes: > On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 23:53 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote: >> Eero Tamminen writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> > ... >> > > As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the >> > > patchset >> > > https://

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-04 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 23:53 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote: > Eero Tamminen writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > ... > > > As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the > > > patchset > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/ > >

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-04 Thread Francisco Jerez
Eero Tamminen writes: > Hi, > > On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > ... >> As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the patchset >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/ >> But he has to watch results for several days to check trend. > > It's close, but the

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-03 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 18:10 +0300, Eero Tamminen wrote: > Hi, > > On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > ... > > As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the > > patchset > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/ > > But he has to watch results for several days

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-09-03 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: ... As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the patchset https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/ But he has to watch results for several days to check trend. It's close, but there is some gap compared to Francisco's v

[PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

2018-08-31 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
The io_boost mechanism, when scheduler update util callback indicates wake from IO was intended for short term boost to improve disk IO performance. But once i915 graphics driver changed to io-schedule_timeout() from schedule_timeout() during waiting for response from GPU, this caused constant IO b