On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:00:08 +0530
Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-02-21, 11:44, Yue Hu wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:14:03 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> > > This may be running in parallel with sugov_update_next_freq() on a
> > > different CPU, so the latter may clear
On 14-02-21, 11:44, Yue Hu wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:14:03 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> > This may be running in parallel with sugov_update_next_freq() on a
> > different CPU, so the latter may clear need_freq_update right after it
> > has been set here unless I'm overlooking
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:14:03 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:08 AM Yue Hu wrote:
> >
> > From: Yue Hu
> >
> > The limits_changed flag was introduced by commit 600f5badb78c
> > ("cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits change")
> > due to race
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:08 AM Yue Hu wrote:
>
> From: Yue Hu
>
> The limits_changed flag was introduced by commit 600f5badb78c
> ("cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits change") due
> to race condition where need_freq_update is cleared in get_next_freq()
> which causes reducing
On 08-02-21, 11:07, Yue Hu wrote:
> From: Yue Hu
>
> The limits_changed flag was introduced by commit 600f5badb78c
> ("cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits change") due
> to race condition where need_freq_update is cleared in get_next_freq()
> which causes reducing the CPU
From: Yue Hu
The limits_changed flag was introduced by commit 600f5badb78c
("cpufreq: schedutil: Don't skip freq update when limits change") due
to race condition where need_freq_update is cleared in get_next_freq()
which causes reducing the CPU frequency is ineffective while busy.
But now, the
6 matches
Mail list logo
