On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 11:39:07 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Well, disabling it for the whole duration of suspend/resume and/or
> > > > hibernation
> > > > may not be the right approach entirely, unless we force the pax perf of
> > > > the
> > >
> > > s/pax/max ?
> >
> > Yes
Hi!
> > > Well, disabling it for the whole duration of suspend/resume and/or
> > > hibernation
> > > may not be the right approach entirely, unless we force the pax perf of
> > > the
> >
> > s/pax/max ?
>
> Yes.
I'm not sure max frequency is a good idea. In particular, early
athlon64 notebook
On Monday, November 25, 2013 09:55:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 November 2013 14:41, viresh kumar wrote:
> > So, what about something like this ?
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> > index f48370d..523c0bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/
On 22 November 2013 14:41, viresh kumar wrote:
> So, what about something like this ?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index f48370d..523c0bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,45 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(release, S_IWUSR, NULL,
>
On Friday 22 November 2013 03:44 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Short-term. To be precise, governors may be stopped at the beginning of
> dpm_suspend_noirq() (that is, where cpuidle_pause() is called). Analogously,
> they may be started again in dpm_resume_noirq(), where cpuidle_resume() is
> cal
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:04:28 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 November 2013 11:09, viresh kumar wrote:
> > On 18 November 2013 03:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:27:43 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> >>> Okay.. Even these notifiers would be fine for me. To
On 11/18/2013 01:39 PM, viresh kumar wrote:
On 18 November 2013 03:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:27:43 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Okay.. Even these notifiers would be fine for me. To make things more clear
before I start implementing them:
- What about implementing
On Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:27:43 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17 November 2013 20:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 17, 2013 01:52:15 PM viresh kumar wrote:
>
> >> Do you see anything extra that might stop working?
> >
> > Well, the code would be racy with the patch as is.
On 16 November 2013 19:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, disabling it for the whole duration of suspend/resume and/or hibernation
> may not be the right approach entirely, unless we force the pax perf of the
s/pax/max ?
> boot CPU at least in addition to that. Otherwise the latency of suspe
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:01:50 AM viresh kumar wrote:
> On Saturday 16 November 2013 05:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Will cpufreq work during system-wide power transitions (suspend/resume etc.)
> > after this? In particular, what about hibernation?
>
> I am disabling governors as
On 11/15/2013 06:12 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch adds PM notifiers for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors.
This is required for early suspend and late resume of governors.
There are multiple reasons that support this patch:
- Firstly it looks very much logical to stop governors w
On Saturday 16 November 2013 05:54 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Will cpufreq work during system-wide power transitions (suspend/resume etc.)
> after this? In particular, what about hibernation?
I am disabling governors as soon as we start suspend. So No, cpufreq wouldn't
work during suspend/res
On Friday, November 15, 2013 03:42:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This patch adds PM notifiers for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors.
> This is required for early suspend and late resume of governors.
>
> There are multiple reasons that support this patch:
> - Firstly it looks very much lo
On 15 November 2013 19:18, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Yes, this does fix the issue for me.
>
> Tested-by: Nishanth Menon
> based on vendor kernel on top of v3.12 tag (equivalent diff:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3609407)
>
> OMAP5-uEVM(OMAP5432): http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3609396
Thanks a lot f
On 11/15/2013 04:12 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This patch adds PM notifiers for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors.
> This is required for early suspend and late resume of governors.
>
> There are multiple reasons that support this patch:
> - Firstly it looks very much logical to stop gov
This patch adds PM notifiers for handling suspend/resume of cpufreq governors.
This is required for early suspend and late resume of governors.
There are multiple reasons that support this patch:
- Firstly it looks very much logical to stop governors when we know we are going
into suspend. But t
16 matches
Mail list logo
