On 6/3/15 23:23, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> Most people probably guessed correctly that this is related to
> building the CRIS v10 kernel with the *-elf toolchain (which has
> the convention that symbols are prefixed with underscores for
> cris-*-elf and crisv32-*-elf) while (IIUC) the CRIS v32
On 6/3/15 23:23, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> Most people probably guessed correctly that this is related to
> building the CRIS v10 kernel with the *-elf toolchain (which has
> the convention that symbols are prefixed with underscores for
> cris-*-elf and crisv32-*-elf) while (IIUC) the CRIS v32
On 06/04/2015 03:20 PM, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:04:26PM +0200, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> - For v10, need we also use "sys*" instead of "_sys*"?
>>
>> No, the trick here is that v10 and v32 uses different stand
On 06/04/2015 03:20 PM, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:04:26PM +0200, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> - For v10, need we also use "sys*" instead of "_sys*"?
>>
>> No, the trick here is that v10 and v32 uses different stand
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 05:04:26PM +0200, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
> > - For v10, need we also use "sys*" instead of "_sys*"?
>
> No, the trick here is that v10 and v32 uses different standards
> with regards to prefixing underscore. I'm h
> From: Jesper Nilsson
> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:04:26 +0200
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
> > - For v10, need we also use "sys*" instead of "_sys*"?
>
> No, the trick here is that v10 and v32 uses different standards
> with regards to prefixing underscore. I'm h
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:36:47PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 06:20 PM, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> The related warnings:
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
> > Thanks and applied, sorry for the long delay, I had to rewrite the
On 06/03/2015 06:20 PM, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
>> The related warnings:
>>
>> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
>> :1229:2: warning: #warning syscall sched_setattr not implemented
>> [-Wcpp]
>> :1232:2: warning: #warning syscall
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Chen Gang wrote:
> The related warnings:
>
> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
> :1229:2: warning: #warning syscall sched_setattr not implemented
> [-Wcpp]
> :1232:2: warning: #warning syscall sched_getattr not implemented
> [-Wcpp]
> :1235:2:
The related warnings:
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
:1229:2: warning: #warning syscall sched_setattr not implemented
[-Wcpp]
:1232:2: warning: #warning syscall sched_getattr not implemented
[-Wcpp]
:1235:2: warning: #warning syscall renameat2 not implemented [-Wcpp]
:1238:2: warni
10 matches
Mail list logo