Thanks Enric, Jett, Gwendal & Andy for taking timeout to review
the patch & provide detailed inputs.
Couple of acks below.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on the discussion we had, only some few comments.
>
> Missatge de Rushikesh S Kadam
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 4:18 AM Enric Balletbo Serra
wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
> Missatge de Andy Shevchenko del dia dj.,
> 28 de febr. 2019 a les 8:57:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:05:35AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > > Missatge de Gwendal Grignou del dia dc., 27 de
> > > febr. 2019
Hi,
Based on the discussion we had, only some few comments.
Missatge de Rushikesh S Kadam del dia
dg., 24 de febr. 2019 a les 10:15:
>
> Intel Integrated Sensor Hub (ISH) is also a MCU running EC
> having feature bit EC_FEATURE_ISH. Instantiate it as a special
> CrOS EC device with device name
Hi Andy,
Missatge de Andy Shevchenko del dia dj.,
28 de febr. 2019 a les 8:57:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:05:35AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > Missatge de Gwendal Grignou del dia dc., 27 de
> > febr. 2019 a les 19:37:
> > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:05:35AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Missatge de Gwendal Grignou del dia dc., 27 de
> febr. 2019 a les 19:37:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
> > wrote:
> > > On 27/2/19 16:13, Jett Rink wrote:
> > You're right, the cros_ names are
Hi Gwendal,
Missatge de Gwendal Grignou del dia dc., 27 de
febr. 2019 a les 19:37:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jett,
> >
> > Many thanks for the explanation.
> >
> > On 27/2/19 16:13, Jett Rink wrote:
> > > The diagram you provided is correct.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:08 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
wrote:
>
> Hi Jett,
>
> Many thanks for the explanation.
>
> On 27/2/19 16:13, Jett Rink wrote:
> > The diagram you provided is correct.
> >
> > The ISH device is a MCU that can run general purpose code that is
> > located on the SoC.
Hi Jett,
Many thanks for the explanation.
On 27/2/19 16:13, Jett Rink wrote:
> The diagram you provided is correct.
>
> The ISH device is a MCU that can run general purpose code that is
> located on the SoC. Typically the ISH collects sensor data and
> processes it before giving it to the AP.
The diagram you provided is correct.
The ISH device is a MCU that can run general purpose code that is
located on the SoC. Typically the ISH collects sensor data and
processes it before giving it to the AP. The ISH HW can run any RTOS,
and in this scenario we are choosing to run the ECOS RTOS. In
Hi,
On 26/2/19 18:21, Jett Rink wrote:
> We are specifically wanting userspace applications to not worry/confuse
> cros_ish
> with a normal cros_ec. Adding an attribute instead of changing the path would
> make it easy for userspace application to forget to check properly before
> accessing the
Intel Integrated Sensor Hub (ISH) is also a MCU running EC
having feature bit EC_FEATURE_ISH. Instantiate it as a special
CrOS EC device with device name 'cros_ish'.
Signed-off-by: Rushikesh S Kadam
---
drivers/mfd/cros_ec_dev.c| 10 ++
include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h |
11 matches
Mail list logo