> On Nov 23, 2018, at 4:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 11/22/2018 11:31 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> The current value of the early boot static pool size, 1024 is not big
>>> enough for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
>>
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 11/22/2018 11:31 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> > The current value of the early boot static pool size, 1024 is not big
> > enough for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
> > objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with b
On 11/22/2018 11:31 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> The current value of the early boot static pool size, 1024 is not big
> enough for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with both timer
> and workqueue objects enabled could
The current value of the early boot static pool size, 1024 is not big
enough for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with both timer
and workqueue objects enabled could trigger "ODEBUG: Out of memory.
ODEBUG disabled"
4 matches
Mail list logo