Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:23:03 -0800 Tim Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I suspect these features reduce the chance a crash messages makes it out
onto the console, but fail to spot any of the copious text mention this
critical issue.
Anything not in inte
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:23:03 -0800 Tim Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I suspect these features reduce the chance a crash messages makes it out
> > onto the console, but fail to spot any of the copious text mention this
> > critical issue.
>
> Anything not in interrup
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I suspect these features reduce the chance a crash messages makes it out
> onto the console, but fail to spot any of the copious text mention this
> critical issue.
Anything not in interrupts would not be deferred.
The following code is meant to avoid deferring in oops as w
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 14:42 -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Tim, could you send me your "postponed print" patches. That sounds like
> > something the -rt patch could use.
>
> Sure. See below.
>
> This patch changes the way the printk code processes output to the
> console buf
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Tim, could you send me your "postponed print" patches. That sounds like
> something the -rt patch could use.
Sure. See below.
This patch changes the way the printk code processes output to the
console buffer. On some platforms, especially those with a serial
console, the
5 matches
Mail list logo