On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 06:16:59PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:15:59PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
> > > not a bus address
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:15:59PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
> > not a bus address for the allocated buffer. Lets assume that actually
> > is correct given
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
> not a bus address for the allocated buffer. Lets assume that actually
> is correct given that it is BIOS-related and that is a good source
> of insanity. In
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:28:46PM -0600, Stuart Hayes wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2019 1:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
> > not a bus address for the allocated buffer. Lets assume that actually
> > is correct given that it is BIOS-
On 1/29/2019 1:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
> not a bus address for the allocated buffer. Lets assume that actually
> is correct given that it is BIOS-related and that is a good source
> of insanity. In that case we shoul
For some odd reason dell_rbu actually seems to want the physical and
not a bus address for the allocated buffer. Lets assume that actually
is correct given that it is BIOS-related and that is a good source
of insanity. In that case we should not use dma_alloc_coherent with
a NULL device to alloca
6 matches
Mail list logo
