Ulrich Drepper writes:
> Richard Gooch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So why do old binaries (compiled with glibc 2.1.3) segfault when they
> > call dlsym() with RTLD_NEXT? Even newly compiled binaries (with glibc
> > 2.2) still segfault.
>
> What do you ask me? You wrote the code.
But you
Richard Gooch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So why do old binaries (compiled with glibc 2.1.3) segfault when they
> call dlsym() with RTLD_NEXT? Even newly compiled binaries (with glibc
> 2.2) still segfault.
What do you ask me? You wrote the code.
--
---.
Ulrich Drepper writes:
> Pierre Rousselet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > for me :
> > make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> > compiles without any patch. is it correct ?
>
> Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available
> via -D_GNU_SOURCE.
So why do old binaries (comp
Ulrich Drepper writes:
> Pierre Rousselet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> for me :
>> make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE'
>> compiles without any patch. is it correct ?
>
> Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available
> via -D_GNU_SOURCE.
This isn't a HURD feature.
This i
While on the subject of devfs:
- it doesn't seem to have any entries for raw devices:
/dev/rawctl, /dev/raw/raw1, etc
- when I upgraded to glibc 2.2 (via a rpm) in RH 7.0
this line in /etc/devfsd.conf caused devfsd to
seg fault:
"LOOKUP ^cdrom$ CFUNCTION GLOBAL
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Pierre Rousselet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > for me :
> > make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> > compiles without any patch. is it correct ?
>
> Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available
> via -D_GNU_SOURCE.
Ok, how about we all tag Richar
Pierre Rousselet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> for me :
> make CFLAGS='-O2 -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> compiles without any patch. is it correct ?
Yes. RTLD_NEXT is not in any standard, it's an extension available
via -D_GNU_SOURCE.
--
---. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake
David Ford wrote:
>
> This patch is simple, defines RTLD_NEXT if not previously defined.
>
> --- devfsd.c.orig Sat Jan 27 18:14:19 2001
> +++ devfsd.cSat Jan 27 18:15:46 2001
> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@
> Last updated by Richard Gooch 3-JUL-2000: Added "-C
> /etc/modules.devfs"
>w
This patch is simple, defines RTLD_NEXT if not previously defined.
--- devfsd.c.orig Sat Jan 27 18:14:19 2001
+++ devfsd.cSat Jan 27 18:15:46 2001
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@
Last updated by Richard Gooch 3-JUL-2000: Added "-C
/etc/modules.devfs"
when calling modprobe(8). Fail if a co
9 matches
Mail list logo