Re: [PATCH] dma: mdc: Correct terminate_all handling

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:59:41PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: > On 05/12/15 08:43, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: > >> From: "Damien.Horsley" > >> > >> Use of the CANCEL bit in mdc_terminate_all creates an > >> additional 'command done' to

Re: [PATCH] dma: mdc: Correct terminate_all handling

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:59:41PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: > On 05/12/15 08:43, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: > >> From: "Damien.Horsley" > >> > >> Use of the CANCEL bit in mdc_terminate_all creates an > >>

Re: [PATCH] dma: mdc: Correct terminate_all handling

On 05/12/15 08:43, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: >> From: "Damien.Horsley" >> >> Use of the CANCEL bit in mdc_terminate_all creates an >> additional 'command done' to appear in the registers (in >> addition to an interrupt). >> >> In addition,

Re: [PATCH] dma: mdc: Correct terminate_all handling

On 05/12/15 08:43, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: >> From: "Damien.Horsley" >> >> Use of the CANCEL bit in mdc_terminate_all creates an >> additional 'command done' to appear in the registers (in >> addition to an

Re: [PATCH] dma: mdc: Correct terminate_all handling

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: > From: "Damien.Horsley" > > Use of the CANCEL bit in mdc_terminate_all creates an > additional 'command done' to appear in the registers (in > addition to an interrupt). > > In addition, there is a potential race between >

Re: [PATCH] dma: mdc: Correct terminate_all handling

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Damien Horsley wrote: > From: "Damien.Horsley" > > Use of the CANCEL bit in mdc_terminate_all creates an > additional 'command done' to appear in the registers (in > addition to an interrupt). > > In addition, there is a